↓ Skip to main content

Euoplocephalus tutus and the Diversity of Ankylosaurid Dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, and Montana, USA

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
83 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
27 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Euoplocephalus tutus and the Diversity of Ankylosaurid Dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, and Montana, USA
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria M. Arbour, Philip J. Currie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Computer Science 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#249,361
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,616
of 225,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,613
of 206,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#84
of 4,956 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,956 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.