↓ Skip to main content

Tumor-Agnostic Precision Medicine from the AACR GENIE Database: Clinical Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor-Agnostic Precision Medicine from the AACR GENIE Database: Clinical Implications
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, May 2023
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0090
Authors

Mohamed A. Gouda, Blessie E. Nelson, Lars Buschhorn, Adam Wahida, Vivek Subbiah

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#879,309
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#589
of 12,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,789
of 331,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#8
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.