The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Angiospermas em remanescentes de floresta montana no sul da Bahia, Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biota Neotropica, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1676-06032009000300028 |
| Authors |
André Márcio Amorim, Jomar Gomes Jardim, Márdel Miranda Mendes Lopes, Pedro Fiaschi, Rafael Augusto Xavier Borges, Ricardo de Oliveira Perdiz, William Wayt Thomas |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 2% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | <1% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 97% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 97% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,505,156
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,193
of 103,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.