↓ Skip to main content

The ChEMBL database as linked open data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 387)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
30 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ChEMBL database as linked open data
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1758-2946-5-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Egon L Willighagen, Andra Waagmeester, Ola Spjuth, Peter Ansell, Antony J Williams, Valery Tkachenko, Janna Hastings, Bin Chen, David J Wild, Willighagen EL, Waagmeester A, Spjuth O, Ansell P, Williams AJ, Tkachenko V, Hastings J, Chen B, Wild DJ

Abstract

Making data available as Linked Data using Resource Description Framework (RDF) promotes integration with other web resources. RDF documents can natively link to related data, and others can link back using Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs). RDF makes the data machine-readable and uses extensible vocabularies for additional information, making it easier to scale up inference and data analysis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 6%
United States 5 6%
Germany 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
China 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 66 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Student > Master 14 16%
Other 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 26 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 27%
Chemistry 21 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 12 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#191,820
of 8,012,961 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#9
of 387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,138
of 119,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,012,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.