You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Developing Criteria for Health Economic Quality Evaluation Tool
Value in Health (Elsevier Science), August 2023
David D. Kim, Lauren A. Do, Patricia G. Synnott, Tara A. Lavelle, Lisa A. Prosser, John B. Wong, Peter J. Neumann
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||19||49%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||1||7%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||7%|
|Student > Master||1||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||2||14%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||7%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,797,973 outputs
Outputs from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 340,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,797,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.