You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Practice parameters for detection of colorectal neoplasms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, September 1999
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02238562 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Clifford L. Simmang, Peter Senatore, Ann Lowry, Terry Hicks, Marcus Burnstein, Frederick Dentsman, Victor Fazio, Edward Glennon, Neil Hyman, Bruce Kerner, John Kilkenny, Richard Moore, Walter Peters, Theodore Ross, Paul Savoca, Anthony Vernava, Douglas W. Wong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#2,064
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,515
of 35,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.