You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
'Scared Straight' and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002796.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony Petrosino, Carolyn Turpin‐Petrosino, Meghan E Hollis‐Peel, Julia G Lavenberg |
| Abstract |
'Scared Straight' and other similar programs involve organized visits to prison by juvenile delinquents or children at risk for criminal behavior. Programs are designed to deter participants from future offending through first hand observation of prison life and interaction with adult inmates. These programs remain in use despite research questioning their effectiveness. This is an update of a 2002 review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 19% |
| Japan | 8 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Sweden | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 77% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 273 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 18% |
| Researcher | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 66 | 24% |
| Psychology | 52 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 75 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#427,198
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#741
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,874
of 204,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.