The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative evidence synthesis: a practical guide on meta-analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias tests for environmental sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-023-00301-6 |
| Authors |
Shinichi Nakagawa, Yefeng Yang, Erin L. Macartney, Rebecca Spake, Malgorzata Lagisz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 20 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,369,521
of 25,885,956 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#45
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,144
of 416,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.