You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recurrent keratoconus: an analysis of breaks in Bowman’s layer in corneal grafts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Ophthalmology, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001225 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynette K Johns, Pia Leon, Paula Cortes-Barrantes, Mehenaz Hanbazazh, David Zurakowski, Thaddeus P Dryja, Joseph B Ciolino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#13,904,402
of 24,356,663 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#130
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,682
of 395,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,356,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.