↓ Skip to main content

Sepsis biomarkers: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
904 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1093 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sepsis biomarkers: a review
Published in
Critical Care, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc8872
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charalampos Pierrakos, Jean-Louis Vincent

Abstract

Biomarkers can be useful for identifying or ruling out sepsis, identifying patients who may benefit from specific therapies or assessing the response to therapy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,093 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 <1%
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
India 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 13 1%
Unknown 1048 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 172 16%
Researcher 163 15%
Student > Master 126 12%
Student > Bachelor 114 10%
Student > Postgraduate 91 8%
Other 272 25%
Unknown 155 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 504 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 10%
Engineering 62 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 47 4%
Other 127 12%
Unknown 183 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,623,514
of 20,850,533 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,476
of 5,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,097
of 172,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,850,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.