↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Stroke Mortality: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Stroke Mortality: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingyao Fan, Yiqing Song, Yuyao Wang, Rutai Hui, Weili Zhang

Abstract

The relationship between dietary glycemic index, glycemic load and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and stroke-related mortality is inconsistent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 25%
Student > Master 22 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 42 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 52 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,052,706
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,436
of 226,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,235
of 291,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#260
of 4,889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.