The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mastication inefficiency due to diminished or lack of occlusal support is associated with increased blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0284319 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yeter E. Bayram, Mehmet A. Eskan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 11 | 19% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 35 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 52 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 29% |
Other | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 29% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 330. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2024.
All research outputs
#106,750
of 26,433,695 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,682
of 229,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,717
of 427,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#39
of 5,686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,433,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.