You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Illusion of knowledge in statistics among clinicians: evaluating the alignment between objective accuracy and subjective confidence, an online survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41235-023-00474-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camille Lakhlifi, François-Xavier Lejeune, Marion Rouault, Mehdi Khamassi, Benjamin Rohaut |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 11 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 77% |
| Scientists | 8 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#895,365
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#54
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,951
of 418,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them