You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Choosing death in unjust conditions: hope, autonomy and harm reduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jme-2022-108871 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kayla Wiebe, Amy Mullin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 505 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 46 | 9% |
| United States | 40 | 8% |
| Germany | 36 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 29 | 6% |
| Unknown | 321 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 466 | 92% |
| Scientists | 16 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 2 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 469. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#55,808
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#20
of 3,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,503
of 396,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.