↓ Skip to main content

Accessibility 2.0: Next Steps for Web Accessibility

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Access Services, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Accessibility 2.0: Next Steps for Web Accessibility
Published in
Journal of Access Services, February 2009
DOI 10.1080/15367960802301028
Authors

Brian Kelly, David Sloan, Stephen Brown, Jane Seale, Patrick Lauke, Simon Ball, Stuart Smith

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Ireland 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 27 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Unspecified 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Other 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 55%
Social Sciences 5 16%
Arts and Humanities 4 13%
Unspecified 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#1,732,677
of 8,761,118 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Access Services
#3
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,453
of 121,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Access Services
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,761,118 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them