You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of Mitomycin C in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0062737 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shi-ming Cheng, Yi-fan Feng, Ling Xu, Yan Li, Jin-hai Huang |
Abstract |
A number of published comparative studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR). However, results have not always been consistent. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to compare the clinical results of EN-DCR with and without MMC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 57% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,258,910
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,964
of 193,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,603
of 193,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,543
of 4,946 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,946 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.