↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Fully Automated Molecular Diagnostic System (AMDS) for Colorectal Cancer Mutation Detection

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Fully Automated Molecular Diagnostic System (AMDS) for Colorectal Cancer Mutation Detection
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiro Kitano, Jamie Myers, Junko Nakamura, Akio Yamane, Mami Yamashita, Masato Nakayama, Yusuke Tsukahara, Hiroshi Ushida, Wanqing Liu, Mark J. Ratain, Masahiko Amano

Abstract

KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations are frequently observed in colorectal cancer (CRC). In particular, KRAS mutations are strong predictors for clinical outcomes of EGFR-targeted treatments such as cetuximab and panitumumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). For mutation analysis, the current methods are time-consuming, and not readily available to all oncologists and pathologists. We have developed a novel, simple, sensitive and fully automated molecular diagnostic system (AMDS) for point of care testing (POCT). Here we report the results of a comparison study between AMDS and direct sequencing (DS) in the detection of KRAS, BRAF and PI3KCA somatic mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 5 18%
Other 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,495,793
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,588
of 193,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,541
of 193,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,204
of 4,936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.