↓ Skip to main content

Vivência e estratégias de enfrentamento de familiares de dependentes

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vivência e estratégias de enfrentamento de familiares de dependentes
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, December 2016
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2015-0044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Lucia de Moraes Horta, Celina Daspett, Julia Horta Tabosa do Egito, Rosa Maria Stefanini de Macedo

Abstract

to understand the experience and coping strategies in relatives of drug addicts. a study was developed with 87 relatives of addicts, registered in two Basic Health Units. The focus group was used as the study method, and content analysis was applied. four categories were chosen: perception of relatives about the drug addiction of their family members; feelings and attitudes related to being a relative of an addict; difficulties found in the process; and, coping strategies. The findings reflected the difficulty when mentioning the subject, and the need of being cared for. Relatives believed that the addict needs to have the will to get into treatment, and they faced challenges in dealing with sporadic disappearances. They pointed to feelings of pity, impotence, disgust, hate, shame, fear of aggressiveness, and humiliation. the biggest difficulties were dealing with relapses, and the lack of public resources. Religiosity and faith, isolation and advice were used as coping strategies; ambivalence in thoughts and attitudes was demonstrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Social Sciences 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#200
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,300
of 416,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.