↓ Skip to main content

A Comparative Assessment of Non-Laboratory-Based versus Commonly Used Laboratory-Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scores in the NHANES III Population

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparative Assessment of Non-Laboratory-Based versus Commonly Used Laboratory-Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scores in the NHANES III Population
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ankur Pandya, Milton C. Weinstein, Thomas A. Gaziano

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 39%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,804,385
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#96,039
of 202,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,649
of 113,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#800
of 1,734 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,734 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.