You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Neurology and Psychiatry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2016.00574 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ignacio Obeso, Antonio Oliviero, Marjan Jahanshahi |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 19 | 22% |
| Psychology | 16 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#842,402
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#336
of 10,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,834
of 424,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.