You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Relationship between soil CO2 fluxes and soil moisture: Anaerobic sources explain fluxes at high water content
Geoderma, June 2023
Linden Fairbairn, Fereidoun Rezanezhad, Mehdi Gharasoo, Chris T. Parsons, Merrin L. Macrae, Stephanie Slowinski, Philippe Van Cappellen
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||26||65%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||6||19%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||6%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||16%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,447,003 outputs
Outputs from Geoderma
of 2,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 366,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoderma
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,447,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.