↓ Skip to main content

Social Functioning in Chinese College Students with and without Schizotypal Personality Traits: An Exploratory Study of the Chinese Version of the First Episode Social Functioning Scale

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Functioning in Chinese College Students with and without Schizotypal Personality Traits: An Exploratory Study of the Chinese Version of the First Episode Social Functioning Scale
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0061115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Wang, Ya-hsuan Yeh, Sin-man Tsang, Wen-hua Liu, Hai-song Shi, Zhi Li, Yan-fang Shi, Ya Wang, Yu-na Wang, Simon S. Y. Lui, David L. Neumann, David H. K. Shum, Raymond C. K. Chan

Abstract

The First Episode Social Functioning Scale (FESFS) was designed to measure social functioning of young individuals with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to validate a Chinese version of the FESFS in a sample of young Chinese adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Nigeria 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Unspecified 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,688,550
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,589
of 193,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,274
of 194,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,541
of 4,999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.