You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Dose Statin Therapy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.112.000712 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes A.N. Dorresteijn, S. Matthijs Boekholdt, Yolanda van der Graaf, John J.P. Kastelein, John C. LaRosa, Terje R. Pedersen, David A. DeMicco, Paul M Ridker, Nancy R. Cook, Frank L.J. Visseren |
| Abstract |
Clinicians need to identify coronary artery disease patients for whom the benefits of high-dose versus usual-dose statin therapy outweigh potential harm. We therefore aimed to develop and validate a model for prediction of the incremental treatment effect of high-dose statins for individual patients in terms of reduction of 5-year absolute risk for myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary death, or cardiac resuscitation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 21% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 21% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2013.
All research outputs
#1,832,663
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#4,102
of 21,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,736
of 206,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#35
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.