↓ Skip to main content

Idiopathic Coccygodynia Lateral Roentgenograms in the Sitting Position and Coccygeal Discography

Overview of attention for article published in Spine, April 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Idiopathic Coccygodynia Lateral Roentgenograms in the Sitting Position and Coccygeal Discography
Published in
Spine, April 1994
DOI 10.1097/00007632-199404150-00011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Yves Maigne, Stéphane Guedj, Catherine Straus

Abstract

The authors hypothesized that the source of coccygodynia was a lesion of the coccygeal disc. This study analyzed the motion of the painful coccyx in the sitting position as compared with the lateral decubitus in a patient and a control group and reported the first results of coccygeal discography (dynamic study). Coccygodynia are usually attributed to soft tissue injuries or psychologic disturbances. No previous study has assessed the coccygeal discs as a source of pain. Fifty-one patients with coccygodynia and 51 controls sustained a dynamic study. Coccygeal mobility was documented by superimposing graph paper with a double reading. The accuracy of the measurement was +/- 2.6 degrees intra- and interobserver variations 15.3 and 12.5%. This dynamic study was followed by coccygeal discography in the patient group. An abnormal motion (luxation or hypermobility) of the coccyx that occurred in the sitting position and spontaneously was reducible when placed in the lateral decubitus position was found in 25 patients. Such lesions could be responsible for the pain because no similar findings were seen in the controls and coccygeal discography was positive in these cases. Of the 26 patients with a normal dynamic study, coccygeal discography, using a combination of provocation and anesthetization, was positive in 15 of 21. Common coccygeal pain could come from the coccygeal disc in approximately 70% of cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Researcher 8 19%
Other 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 50%
Engineering 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Spine
#2,622
of 8,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,076
of 21,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.