↓ Skip to main content

Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00167-006-0040-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille Neeter, Alexander Gustavsson, Pia Thomeé, Jesper Augustsson, Roland Thomeé, Jon Karlsson

Abstract

A more sports-specific and detailed strength assessment has been advocated for patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to develop a test battery of lower extremity strength tests with high ability to discriminate between leg power development on the injured and uninjured sides in patients after ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Twenty-three patients were tested 6 months after ACL injury and 44 patients were tested 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four of the 44 patients were operated on using a hamstrings graft and 20 patients were operated on using a patellar tendon graft. All the patients performed a test battery of three strength tests for each leg in a randomised order. The three strength tests were chosen to reflect quadriceps and hamstring muscular power in a knee-extension and a knee-flexion test (open kinetic chain) and lower-extremity muscular power in a leg-press test (closed kinetic chain). There was a higher sensitivity for the test battery to discriminate abnormal leg power compared with any of the three strength tests individually. Nine out of ten patients after ACL reconstruction and six out of ten of the patients after ACL injury exhibited abnormal leg power symmetry using the test battery. Thus, this test battery had high ability in terms of discriminating between the leg power performance on the injured and uninjured side, both in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. It is concluded that a test battery consisting of a knee-extension, knee-flexion and leg-press muscle power test had high ability to determine deficits in leg power 6 months after ACL injury and reconstruction. Only a minority of the patients had restored leg muscle power. The clinical relevance is that the test battery may contribute to the decision-making process when deciding whether and when patients can safely return to strenuous physical activities after an ACL injury or reconstruction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 263 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Other 17 6%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 65 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 29%
Sports and Recreations 50 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 78 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,271,909
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,771
of 2,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,165
of 156,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.