You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automatic landmarking identifies new loci associated with face morphology and implicates Neanderthal introgression in human nasal shape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Communications Biology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s42003-023-04838-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qing Li, Jieyi Chen, Pierre Faux, Miguel Eduardo Delgado, Betty Bonfante, Macarena Fuentes-Guajardo, Javier Mendoza-Revilla, J. Camilo Chacón-Duque, Malena Hurtado, Valeria Villegas, Vanessa Granja, Claudia Jaramillo, William Arias, Rodrigo Barquera, Paola Everardo-Martínez, Mirsha Sánchez-Quinto, Jorge Gómez-Valdés, Hugo Villamil-Ramírez, Caio C. Silva de Cerqueira, Tábita Hünemeier, Virginia Ramallo, Sijie Wu, Siyuan Du, Andrea Giardina, Soumya Subhra Paria, Mahfuzur Rahman Khokan, Rolando Gonzalez-José, Lavinia Schüler-Faccini, Maria-Cátira Bortolini, Victor Acuña-Alonzo, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros, Carla Gallo, Giovanni Poletti, Winston Rojas, Francisco Rothhammer, Nicolas Navarro, Sijia Wang, Kaustubh Adhikari, Andrés Ruiz-Linares |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 7% |
| Colombia | 10 | 7% |
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| Spain | 7 | 5% |
| Argentina | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 66 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 103 | 77% |
| Scientists | 21 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,895
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Communications Biology
#3
of 5,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44
of 404,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Biology
#1
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.