↓ Skip to main content

A New Chamber for Studying the Behavior of Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A New Chamber for Studying the Behavior of Drosophila
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasper C. Simon, Michael H. Dickinson

Abstract

Methods available for quickly and objectively quantifying the behavioral phenotypes of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, lag behind in sophistication the tools developed for manipulating their genotypes. We have developed a simple, easy-to-replicate, general-purpose experimental chamber for studying the ground-based behaviors of fruit flies. The major innovative feature of our design is that it restricts flies to a shallow volume of space, forcing all behavioral interactions to take place within a monolayer of individuals. The design lessens the frequency that flies occlude or obscure each other, limits the variability in their appearance, and promotes a greater number of flies to move throughout the center of the chamber, thereby increasing the frequency of their interactions. The new chamber design improves the quality of data collected by digital video and was conceived and designed to complement automated machine vision methodologies for studying behavior. Novel and improved methodologies for better quantifying the complex behavioral phenotypes of Drosophila will facilitate studies related to human disease and fundamental questions of behavioral neuroscience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 230 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 23%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 8%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 27 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 47%
Neuroscience 44 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 9%
Engineering 15 6%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 28 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,186,092
of 24,935,186 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#96,876
of 216,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,170
of 174,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#320
of 655 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,935,186 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 655 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.