The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Classificações de diagnóstico e intervenção de enfermagem: NANDA-NIC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-21002009000700003 |
Authors |
Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 35 | 78% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 37 | 82% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#21,155,664
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Acta Paulista de Enfermagem
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,251
of 187,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Paulista de Enfermagem
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them