↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Genetic Susceptibility to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Placental Malaria in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Impact of Genetic Susceptibility to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Placental Malaria in Mice
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062820
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Waisberg, Christina K. Lin, Chiung-Yu Huang, Mirna Pena, Marlene Orandle, Silvia Bolland, Susan K. Pierce

Abstract

Severe malaria, including cerebral malaria (CM) and placental malaria (PM), have been recognized to have many of the features of uncontrolled inflammation. We recently showed that in mice genetic susceptibility to the lethal inflammatory autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), conferred resistance to CM. Protection appeared to be mediated by immune mechanisms that allowed SLE-prone mice, prior to the onset of overt SLE symptoms, to better control their inflammatory response to Plasmodium infection. Here we extend these findings to ask does SLE susceptibility have 1) a cost to reproductive fitness and/or 2) an effect on PM in mice? The rates of conception for WT and SLE susceptible (SLE(s)) mice were similar as were the number and viability of fetuses in pregnant WT and SLE(s) mice indicating that SLE susceptibility does not have a reproductive cost. We found that Plasmodium chabaudi AS (Pc) infection disrupted early stages of pregnancy before the placenta was completely formed resulting in massive decidual necrosis 8 days after conception. Pc-infected pregnant SLE(s) mice had significantly more fetuses (∼1.8 fold) but SLE did not significantly affect fetal viability in infected animals. This was despite the fact that Pc-infected pregnant SLE(s) mice had more severe symptoms of malaria as compared to Pc-infected pregnant WT mice. Thus, although SLE susceptibility was not protective in PM in mice it also did not have a negative impact on reproductive fitness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 7%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Lecturer 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 8 27%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,193,180
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,057
of 193,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,684
of 193,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,270
of 4,997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.