↓ Skip to main content

mRuby, a Bright Monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein for Labeling of Subcellular Structures

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
445 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
mRuby, a Bright Monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein for Labeling of Subcellular Structures
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Kredel, Franz Oswald, Karin Nienhaus, Karen Deuschle, Carlheinz Röcker, Michael Wolff, Ralf Heilker, G. Ulrich Nienhaus, Jörg Wiedenmann

Abstract

A monomeric variant of the red fluorescent protein eqFP611, mRuby, is described. With excitation and emission maxima at 558 nm and 605 nm, respectively, and a large Stokes shift of 47 nm, mRuby appears particularly useful for imaging applications. The protein shows an exceptional resistance to denaturation at pH extremes. Moreover, mRuby is about ten-fold brighter compared to EGFP when being targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum. The engineering process of eqFP611 revealed that the C-terminal tail of the protein acts as a natural peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS). Using an mRuby variant carrying the eqFP611-PTS, we discovered that ordered inheritance of peroxisomes is widespread during mitosis of different mammalian cell types. The ordered partitioning is realized by the formation of peroxisome clusters around the poles of the mitotic spindle and ensures that equal numbers of the organelle are inherited by the daughter cells. The unique spectral properties make mRuby the marker of choice for a multitude of cell biological applications. Moreover, the use of mRuby has allowed novel insights in the biology of organelles responsible for severe human diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 445 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 421 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 27%
Researcher 102 23%
Student > Master 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 41 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 191 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 19%
Neuroscience 30 7%
Chemistry 26 6%
Physics and Astronomy 17 4%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 48 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,057,407
of 24,004,724 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,502
of 206,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,044
of 176,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#206
of 540 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,004,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 540 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.