The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003928.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meaghan E Coyle, Caroline Smith, Brian Peat |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,305,329
of 26,281,970 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,579
of 13,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,719
of 410,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,281,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.