The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Socioeconomic inequalities of Long COVID: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1177/01410768231168377 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharmin Shabnam, Cameron Razieh, Hajira Dambha-Miller, Tom Yates, Clare Gillies, Yogini V Chudasama, Manish Pareek, Amitava Banerjee, Ichiro Kawachi, Ben Lacey, Eva JA Morris, Martin White, Francesco Zaccardi, Kamlesh Khunti, Nazrul Islam |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 79% |
| Scientists | 10 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 321. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#110,735
of 26,362,847 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#53
of 3,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,781
of 412,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.