You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Updating Phylogeny of Mitochondrial DNA Macrohaplogroup M in India: Dispersal of Modern Human in South Asian Corridor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0007447 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adimoolam Chandrasekar, Satish Kumar, Jwalapuram Sreenath, Bishwa Nath Sarkar, Bhaskar Pralhad Urade, Sujit Mallick, Syam Sundar Bandopadhyay, Pinuma Barua, Subihra Sankar Barik, Debasish Basu, Uttaravalli Kiran, Prodyot Gangopadhyay, Ramesh Sahani, Bhagavatula Venkata Ravi Prasad, Shampa Gangopadhyay, Gandikota Rama Lakshmi, Rajasekhara Reddy Ravuri, Koneru Padmaja, Pulamaghatta N. Venugopal, Madhu Bala Sharma, Vadlamudi Raghavendra Rao |
| Abstract |
To construct maternal phylogeny and prehistoric dispersals of modern human being in the Indian sub continent, a diverse subset of 641 complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genomes belonging to macrohaplogroup M was chosen from a total collection of 2,783 control-region sequences, sampled from 26 selected tribal populations of India. On the basis of complete mtDNA sequencing, we identified 12 new haplogroups--M53 to M64; redefined/ascertained and characterized haplogroups M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M8'C'Z, M9, M10, M11, M12-G, D, M18, M30, M33, M35, M37, M38, M39, M40, M41, M43, M45 and M49, which were previously described by control and/or coding-region polymorphisms. Our results indicate that the mtDNA lineages reported in the present study (except East Asian lineages M8'C'Z, M9, M10, M11, M12-G, D) are restricted to Indian region.The deep rooted lineages of macrohaplogroup 'M' suggest in-situ origin of these haplogroups in India. Most of these deep rooting lineages are represented by multiple ethnic/linguist groups of India. Hierarchical analysis of molecular variation (AMOVA) shows substantial subdivisions among the tribes of India (Fst = 0.16164). The current Indian mtDNA gene pool was shaped by the initial settlers and was galvanized by minor events of gene flow from the east and west to the restricted zones. Northeast Indian mtDNA pool harbors region specific lineages, other Indian lineages and East Asian lineages. We also suggest the establishment of an East Asian gene in North East India through admixture rather than replacement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 27% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,511,031
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,504
of 193,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,108
of 93,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#133
of 535 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 535 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.