The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,032 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Illegal killing associated with gamebird management accounts for up to three-quarters of annual mortality in Hen Harriers Circus cyaneus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110072 |
| Authors |
Steven R. Ewing, Cathleen E. Thomas, Nigel Butcher, Blánaid Denman, David J.T. Douglas, David I.K. Anderson, Guy Q.A. Anderson, James Bray, Steve Downing, Ronan Dugan, Brian Etheridge, Will Hayward, Fiona Howie, Staffan Roos, Mark Thomas, Jenny Weston, Jennifer Smart, Jeremy D. Wilson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 240 | 23% |
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| Ireland | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Comoros | 2 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 1% |
| Unknown | 739 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 942 | 91% |
| Scientists | 34 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 24 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 932. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#19,223
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#10
of 6,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#560
of 380,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.