↓ Skip to main content

Exact and metaheuristic methods for a real-world examination timetabling problem

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scheduling, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exact and metaheuristic methods for a real-world examination timetabling problem
Published in
Journal of Scheduling, May 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10951-023-00778-6
Authors

Mats Carlsson, Sara Ceschia, Luca Di Gaspero, Rasmus Ørnstrup Mikkelsen, Andrea Schaerf, Thomas Jacob Riis Stidsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 20%
Computer Science 1 10%
Decision Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,992,503
of 23,736,443 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#71
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,210
of 235,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,736,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them