The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Science across the Meiji divide: Vernacular literary genres as vectors of science in modern Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
History of Science, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1177/00732753231170413 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruselle Meade |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,651,017
of 26,253,210 outputs
Outputs from History of Science
#13
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,010
of 410,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from History of Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,253,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them