The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Creating conservation strategies with value‐focused thinking
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Biology, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.1111/cobi.14109 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David M. Martin, Joshua G. Goldstein, David R. Smith, Jessica Musengezi, Jessie G. Rountree, G. A. Pabodha Galgamuwa, Aileen Craig, Michelle Dietz, Caitlin Kerr |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 17% |
Poland | 1 | 17% |
India | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,327,452
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,680
of 4,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,472
of 368,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#33
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.