The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 226 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inadvertent human genomic bycatch and intentional capture raise beneficial applications and ethical concerns with environmental DNA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-023-02056-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam Whitmore, Mark McCauley, Jessica A. Farrell, Maximilian R. Stammnitz, Samantha A. Koda, Narges Mashkour, Victoria Summers, Todd Osborne, Jenny Whilde, David J. Duffy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 199 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 189 | 84% |
| Scientists | 35 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1690. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,671
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#17
of 2,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188
of 404,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#3
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 153.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.