↓ Skip to main content

A Universal System for Highly Efficient Cardiac Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells That Eliminates Interline Variability

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
16 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
516 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Universal System for Highly Efficient Cardiac Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells That Eliminates Interline Variability
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul W. Burridge, Susan Thompson, Michal A. Millrod, Seth Weinberg, Xuan Yuan, Ann Peters, Vasiliki Mahairaki, Vassilis E. Koliatsos, Leslie Tung, Elias T. Zambidis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 516 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 491 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 137 27%
Researcher 113 22%
Student > Master 56 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 83 16%
Unknown 60 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 197 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 103 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 12%
Engineering 43 8%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 33 6%
Unknown 71 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,059,221
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,983
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,151
of 125,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#291
of 1,557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.