↓ Skip to main content

Temporary wetlands: challenges and solutions to conserving a ‘disappearing’ ecosystem

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporary wetlands: challenges and solutions to conserving a ‘disappearing’ ecosystem
Published in
Biological Conservation, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.024
Authors

Aram J.K. Calhoun, David M. Mushet, Kathleen P. Bell, Dani Boix, James A. Fitzsimons, Francis Isselin-Nondedeu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 252 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 15%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 56 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 80 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 25%
Engineering 11 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 75 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,579,734
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,689
of 6,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,242
of 313,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#74
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.