↓ Skip to main content

Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003315.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alyson Bessell, Lee Hooper, William C Shaw, Sheena Reilly, Julie Reid, Anne-Marie Glenny

Abstract

Cleft lip and cleft palate are common birth defects, affecting about one baby of every 700 born. Feeding these babies is an immediate concern and there is evidence of delay in growth of children with a cleft as compared to those without clefting. In an effort to combat reduced weight for height, a variety of advice and devices are recommended to aid feeding of babies with clefts.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 189 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 26%
Student > Bachelor 31 16%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Unspecified 16 8%
Other 57 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 17%
Unspecified 30 16%
Psychology 11 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 21 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2017.
All research outputs
#528,789
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,647
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,182
of 147,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.