↓ Skip to main content

Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003315.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alyson Bessell, Lee Hooper, William C Shaw, Sheena Reilly, Julie Reid, Anne‐Marie Glenny

Abstract

Cleft lip and cleft palate are common birth defects, affecting about one baby of every 700 born. Feeding these babies is an immediate concern and there is evidence of delay in growth of children with a cleft as compared to those without clefting. In an effort to combat reduced weight for height, a variety of advice and devices are recommended to aid feeding of babies with clefts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 423 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 20%
Student > Bachelor 55 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 7%
Researcher 28 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 71 17%
Unknown 132 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 12%
Psychology 18 4%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 139 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,660,244
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,543
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,454
of 118,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.