↓ Skip to main content

The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 6,151)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
140 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, May 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah D. Silverberg, Grant L. Iverson, ACRM Brain Injury Special Interest Group Mild TBI Task Force members:, Alison Cogan, Kristen Dams-O-Connor, Richard Delmonico, Min Jeong P. Graf, Mary Alexis Iaccarino, Maria Kajankova, Joshua Kamins, Karen L. McCulloch, Gary McKinney, Drew Nagele, William J. Panenka, Amanda R. Rabinowitz, Nick Reed, Jennifer V. Wethe, Victoria Whitehair, ACRM Mild TBI Diagnostic Criteria Expert Consensus Group:, Vicki Anderson, David B. Arciniegas, Mark T. Bayley, Jeffery J. Bazarian, Kathleen R. Bell, Steven P. Broglio, David Cifu, Gavin A. Davis, Jiri Dvorak, Ruben J. Echemendia, Gerard A. Gioia, Christopher C. Giza, Sidney R. Hinds, Douglas I. Katz, Brad G. Kurowski, John J. Leddy, Natalie Le Sage, Angela Lumba-Brown, Andrew IR. Maas, Geoffrey T. Manley, Michael McCrea, David K. Menon, Jennie Ponsford, Margot Putukian, Stacy J. Suskauer, Joukje van der Naalt, William C. Walker, Keith Owen Yeates, Ross Zafonte, Nathan D. Zasler, Roger Zemek

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 14 9%
Researcher 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Professor 7 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 77 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Neuroscience 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Psychology 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 76 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 265. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#147,116
of 26,558,327 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#12
of 6,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,517
of 403,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#1
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.