↓ Skip to main content

Use of a High Resolution Melting (HRM) Assay to Compare Gag, Pol, and Env Diversity in Adults with Different Stages of HIV Infection

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of a High Resolution Melting (HRM) Assay to Compare Gag, Pol, and Env Diversity in Adults with Different Stages of HIV Infection
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew M. Cousins, Oliver Laeyendecker, Geetha Beauchamp, Ronald Brookmeyer, William I. Towler, Sarah E. Hudelson, Leila Khaki, Beryl Koblin, Margaret Chesney, Richard D. Moore, Gabor D. Kelen, Thomas Coates, Connie Celum, Susan P. Buchbinder, George R. Seage, Thomas C. Quinn, Deborah Donnell, Susan H. Eshleman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Professor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#18,832,879
of 24,001,212 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#158,864
of 205,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,386
of 144,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,132
of 2,682 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,001,212 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,682 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.