↓ Skip to main content

Lack of Genetic Differentiation between Contrasted Overwintering Strategies of a Major Pest Predator Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae): Implications for Biocontrol

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lack of Genetic Differentiation between Contrasted Overwintering Strategies of a Major Pest Predator Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae): Implications for Biocontrol
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0072997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucie Raymond, Manuel Plantegenest, Bertrand Gauffre, Jean-Pierre Sarthou, Aude Vialatte

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 62%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,850,231
of 23,804,762 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#97,052
of 203,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,617
of 200,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,094
of 4,974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,804,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.