↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of 2 Federally Recommended Strategies to Reduce Excess Body Fat in Overweight, Low-Income Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Family Medicine, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 1,984)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of 2 Federally Recommended Strategies to Reduce Excess Body Fat in Overweight, Low-Income Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting
Published in
Annals of Family Medicine, May 2023
DOI 10.1370/afm.2964
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J McCarthy, Melvin Rico, Maria Chandler, Dena R Herman, Cindy Chang, Thomas R Belin, Stephanie Love, Evangelina Ramirez, Lillian Gelberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Unspecified 4 10%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 20 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Chemistry 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 20 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 380. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#85,669
of 26,303,092 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#20
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,087
of 398,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,303,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.