The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 264 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Production method of the Königsaue birch tar documents cumulative culture in Neanderthals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-023-01789-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Schmidt, Tabea J. Koch, Matthias A. Blessing, F. Alexandros Karakostis, Katerina Harvati, Veit Dresely, Armelle Charrié-Duhaut |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 230 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 226 | 86% |
| Scientists | 35 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 444. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#66,519
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#4
of 1,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,697
of 399,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.