You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Alpine Cushion Plant Silene acaulis as Foundation Species: A Bug’s-Eye View to Facilitation and Microclimate
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037223 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Olivia Molenda, Anya Reid, Christopher J. Lortie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 21% |
Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 26 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#918,123
of 23,835,032 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,300
of 203,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,912
of 166,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#165
of 3,784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,835,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.