You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Feeding ecology of carnivores (Mammalia, Carnivora) in Atlantic Forest remnants, Southern Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biota Neotropica, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1676-06032010000400001 |
Authors |
Fabiana Rocha-Mendes, Sandra Bos Mikich, Juliana Quadros, Wagner André Pedro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 12 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 47 | 21% |
Student > Master | 37 | 16% |
Researcher | 31 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
Other | 37 | 16% |
Unknown | 34 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 56% |
Environmental Science | 51 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 39 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,422,545
of 23,832,995 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#9
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,173
of 185,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,832,995 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.