You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What approaches exist to evaluate the effectiveness of UK-relevant natural flood management measures? A systematic map
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-023-00297-z |
| Authors |
Angela Connelly, Andrew Snow, Jeremy Carter, Jana Wendler, Rachel Lauwerijssen, Joseph Glentworth, Adam Barker, John Handley, Graham Haughton, James Rothwell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Norway | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#13,911,324
of 23,994,935 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#263
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,449
of 320,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,994,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.