↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of long-term adverse events regarding different COVID-19 vaccine regimens within an 18-month follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in Pathogens and Disease, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of long-term adverse events regarding different COVID-19 vaccine regimens within an 18-month follow-up study
Published in
Pathogens and Disease, May 2023
DOI 10.1093/femspd/ftad010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mona Sadat Larijani, Rahim Sorouri, Sana Eybpoosh, Delaram Doroud, Ladan Moradi, Mozhgan Ahmadinezhad, Anahita Bavand, Fatemeh Ashrafian, Parinaz Tajmehrabi Namini, Mahsan Zali, Amitis Ramezani

Abstract

Early reports on COVID-19 vaccines presented the short-term adverse events (AEs). This follow-up study investigated a standard regimen based on protein subunit vaccines, PastoCovac and PastoCovac Plus, and the combinational vaccine regimens including AstraZeneca/PastoCovac Plus and Sinopharm/PastoCovac Plus. The participants were followed up to 6 months post-the booster shot. All the AEs were collected through in-depth interview using a valid researcher-made questionnaire and were evaluated regarding the association with the vaccines. Of the 509 individuals, 6.2% of the combinational vaccine participants had late AEs from whom 3.3% suffered from cutaneous manifestations followed by 1.1% arthralgia complains, 1.1% with neurologic disorders, 0.3% ocular problem and 0.3% metabolic complication, with no significant difference between the vaccine regimens. Of the standard regimen, 2% of the individuals experienced late AEs as (1%), neurologic disorders (0.3%), metabolic problem (0.3%) and joints involvements (0.3%). Notably, 75% of the AEs were persistent up to the end of the study. A low number of late AEs were captured in 18 months as 12 improbable, 5 unclassifiable, 4 possible and 3 probable associated AEs with the vaccine regimens. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination are far from the potential risks and the late AEs seem to be uncommon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Unspecified 2 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,042,633
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from Pathogens and Disease
#191
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,169
of 373,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathogens and Disease
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.